Poltergeist

Poltergeist (2015)

5/20/2015
93 minutes
5

A family's suburban home is invaded by angry spirits. When the terrifying apparitions escalate their attacks and take the youngest daughter, the family must come together to rescue her.

Revenue: $95,437,994

Details

Budget

$35,000,000

Rating

5/10 (2288 votes)

Status

Released

Production Companies

TSG Entertainment, Ghost House Pictures, Vertigo Entertainment, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Fox 2000 Pictures

About Poltergeist

The 2015 version of "Poltergeist" revisits the story of a suburban family whose new home becomes a center of paranormal activity. As the haunting intensifies, spirits target the youngest daughter, prompting the family to try to rescue her. The film is categorized as horror and leans into themes of haunted houses and possession, with modern effects for a new generation. It features a runtime of 93 minutes.

Reviews for the film reflect a mixed reception, with a 29% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a 47/100 on Metacritic. The IMDb rating is 4.9 out of 10 from over 65,000 votes. Many critics and viewers often compared it to the 1982 original, noting its approach as a remake.

The movie attempts to update the original concept with new technology and visual effects. Despite its intentions, many found it to be a less impactful experience compared to its predecessor. Key actors include Sam Rockwell, whose performance was noted by some as a highlight.

Rotten Tomatoes 29%
Metacritic 47/100
IMDb 4.9/10

Why you might be searching for Poltergeist

People are searching for "Poltergeist" (2015) to find out how it compares to the original, particularly in terms of scares and character portrayals. Many are curious about specific scenes, such as children's faces appearing in a wood banister or a daughter digging up the family room floor.

What reviewers are saying

Zevi Wolmark

A reviewer found the film to be ordinary and bland, describing it as a less compelling version of the original haunting story, and felt the director focused more on the evil house than on likable characters or engaging scares.

Read the full review
Reno 5/10

One viewer stated the film might have been better as an original story rather than a remake, noting that it closely mirrored the 80s version frame by frame, only updating the cast and modern gadgets.

Read the full review
talisencrw 7/10

Despite initial reservations about the remake, one audience member found it wasn't as bad as anticipated, crediting the special effects and performances by Sam Rockwell, Jared Harris, and Jane Adams for making the film watchable.

Read the full review
r96sk 5/10

This film was described by one reviewer as 'lame horror,' offering nothing particularly good; they found the story predictable, the cast forgettable, and the film lacking in scares for its genre.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about finding and identifying movies